Legal Opinion

Davis v. Parrington

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 5, 1922No. Nos. 3799, 3800, 3828PublishedCited by 17 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Oregon; Robert S. Bean, Judge. Separate actions at law by A. J. Parrington against James C. Davis, Agent, and against the San Francisco & Portland Steamship Company, and by the Portland Seed Company against James C. Davis, as Agent, for the recovery of excess charges by carriers. Judgment for the plaintiff in each case, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Parrington’s Cases.

HUNT, Circuit Judge.

These cases involve rates on sugar from San Francisco, Cal., to Portland, Or. The San Francisco & Portland Steamship Company, called the Steamship Company, operates a line of steamers between San Francisco and Portland, via Pacific Ocean and Columbia and Willamette rivers, with a regular landing place at Ainsworth dock, in Portland, where connection is had with the Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Company, called the Railroad Company, extending from Portland to North Portland. From December 28, 1917, to February 29, 1920, the Director General…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Railroad v. International Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Wisconsin RR Comm. v. C., B. & QRR CO.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Puritan Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. A. J. Phillips Co. v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Skinner & Eddy Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. SchaeferCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  2. American Can Co. v. Ladoga Canning Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1930
  3. Texas Co. v. SchriewerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Glens Falls Portland Cement Co. v. Delaware &. Hudson Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  5. Goodspeed v. DubyOregon Supreme Court · 1929

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API