Goodspeed v. Duby
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, C. J.
The contention of appellant Independence Indemnity company is that it can not be compelled to pay more than the penalty of its bond. The amount of costs and attorney’s fee taxed against it is in excess of the penalty of its bond. The defendant claimants did not receive the full amount due them but were compelled to prorate because the amount of the funds in the hands of defendant highway commission and the penalty of the bond were not sufficient to pay plaintiff and said claims for material in full. Defendant Independence Indemnity company deposited in court with its answer the amount of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Illinois Surety Co. v. John Davis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Getchell & Martin Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Peterson & SampsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Title Guarantee Co. v. WrennOregon Supreme Court · 1899
- Brainard v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Holmes v. Standard Oil Co. of IndianaIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Adair v. McAteeOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Electrical Products Corp. v. Ziegler Drug Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. HydeOregon Supreme Court · 1934
- State v. ClaypoolOregon Supreme Court · 1934
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CasassaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.