Skinner & Eddy Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Appeal from the district court of the united states FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. The case is stated in the opinion..
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brandeis
The last paragraph of § 4 of the Act to Regulate Commerce, as amended by Act of June 18, 1910, c. 309, § 8, 36 Stat. 539, 547, declares that: “Whenever a carrier by railroad shall in competition with a water route or routes reduce the rates on the carriage of any species of freight to or from competitive points, it shall not be permitted to increase such rates unless after hearing by the Interstate Commerce Commission it shall be found that such proposed increase rests upon changed conditions other than the elimination of water competition.”
Oh August 21, 1916, Skinner & Eddy Corporation…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Manufacturers Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by187 opinions
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- The Toilet Goods Association, Inc. v. John w.ga Rdner, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Toilet Goods Ass'n v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Arizona Grocery Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Greene v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
182 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.