Legal Opinion

Shears v. Rigley

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1993No. 02640PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County denying Appellants’ petition to dismiss the instant action based on forum non conveniens pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 5322(e). 1 We affirm.

This matter arises out of an alleged slip and fall which occurred at a K-Mart department store located in New Jersey brought by the Appellees, Anna and Stephen Shears (Shears). Initially, Appellants Bernard Rigley (Rigley) and K-Mart Corporation (K-Mart) filed preliminary objections and asserted that venue in Philadelphia was improper. These preliminary…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Plum v. Tampax, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Petty v. Suburban General HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Kubik v. Route 252, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Masel v. GlassmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Mathues v. Tim-Bar Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Farley v. McDonnell Douglas Truck Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Kring v. University of PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API