Legal Opinion
Harris v. Brill
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 30, 2004PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
MUSMANNO, J.:
¶ 1 Gary Harris (“Harris”) appeals from an Order entered on April 25, 2008, granting preliminary objections filed by William T. Jorden (“Jorden”), Thomas Dana Watson (“Watson”), and Gene Rum-sey (“Rumsey”) (collectively “Appellees”) and transferring venue to Crawford County, Pennsylvania. 1 We reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with this Opinion.
¶ 2 The instant matter involves an action filed by Harris in the Court of Common Pleas of Erie County against Brill, Jorden, Watson and Rumsey (collectively “Defendants”), alleging claims of wrongful use of civil…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Werner v. Plater-ZyberkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Craig v. W. J. Thiele & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Wood v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Mathues v. Tim-Bar Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Kring v. University of PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Deyarmin v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- McMillan v. First National Bank of BerwickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Baylson, F. v. Genetics & IVF Inst.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- W. Reed v. P. Brown and Borough of ColwynCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Lawrence v. Walker, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Centre County2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.