Legal Opinion
Naifeh v. Ronson Art Metal Works, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided March 23, 1953No. Civ. A. No. 5669PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Z. T. Naifeh, formerly a distributor for the defendant, Ronson Art Metal Works, Inc., brings this action “under the provisions of The Anti-Trust Acts and all amendments thereto.”
Service was obtained upon a corporate officer at the home office of the defendant in Newark, New Jersey. Inasmuch as Section 12 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 22, provides that in a suit brought under the anti-trust laws a corporation “may be served in the district of which it is an inhabitant, or wherever it may be found”, doubtless this service of process was effective.1
Howev…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- United States v. Scophony Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Frene v. Louisville Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Raul International Corp. v. Nu-Era Gear Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Harry Brandt, D/B/A University City House of Liquors v. Renfield Importers, Ltd., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- Crawford Transport Company v. Chrysler CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1961
- Exhibitors Service, Inc. v. Abbey RentsDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1955