Fackrell v. McDonald
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PRESTON (H. L.), J., pro tem.
This is an appeal by defendant Hugh McDonald from a judgment entered against him upon a verdict of a jury in the sum of $5,000 in an action for malicious prosecution. Appellant also appeals from the order denying him a new trial. The order denying a new trial is not appealable and for that reason the attempted appeal therefrom must be dismissed.
The plaintiff C. E. Faekrell brought this action in the superior court of Los Angeles County, alleging that the defendant Hugh McDonald did, maliciously and without probable cause, swear to a complaint charging him with the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Franzen v. ShenkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Burke v. WattsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Grant v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Davis v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
- Runo v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Haydel v. MortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Walker v. JensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Lowe v. Skaggs Safeway Stores, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1930