Legal Opinion

State v. Saas

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1991No. 57685-8PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The State seeks review of the Court of Appeals determination that the respondent's guilty plea lacked a factual basis. Dolores Saas faced nine potential counts of securities fraud when, as part of a plea agreement, she pleaded guilty to one count of securities fraud. Prior to sentencing, she moved to withdraw her guilty plea. The trial court denied this motion. The Court of Appeals reversed. Without the benefit of briefing or argument by any of the parties, the Court of Appeals adopted the test in Reves v. Ernst & Young, 494 U.S. 56, 108 L. Ed. 2d 47, 110 S. Ct. 945 (1990) for determining…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. State v. NewtonWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State v. OsborneWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. BlightWashington Supreme Court · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. In re the Personal Restraint of IsadoreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In Re IsadoreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. ElmoreWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. WalshWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 1996

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API