Legal Opinion

Nissan Motor Mfg. Corp., USA v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided August 16, 1988No. 87-01-00051PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DiCARLO, Judge:

Cross-motions for summary judgment, made pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of this Court, frame the question of whether machinery imported to produce merchandise in a foreign trade zone subzone should be subject to duty. Nissan Motor Manufacturing Corporation U.S.A. (Nissan) moves for summary judgment requiring the United States Customs Service (Customs) to reliquidate entries of production machinery and related capital equipment and refund over $3,000,000 in duties. The United States moves for summary judgment affirming Customs’ assessment of duties.

The Court finds from its…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rhone Poulenc S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  2. Carl K. Butler v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  3. Hawaiian Independent Refinery v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
  4. Ellis K. Orlowitz Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nissan Motor Mfg. Corp., U.S.A. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  2. Conoco Inc. v. United States Foreign-Trade Zones BoardUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
  3. Conoco, Inc. v. United States Foreign-Trade Zones BoardUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
  4. BMW Manufacturing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
  5. Karen S. McDowell v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API