Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Rhone Poulenc S.A. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided March 29, 1984No. Court 81-1-00079PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RESTANI, Judge:

This matter is before the court on plaintiffs’ motion to amend their complaint challenging a determination of the United States Department of Commerce (Commerce) of sales at Less Than Fair Value (LTFV) pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1673d(a) (1982) of the antidumping laws. 1 The amendment would add a claim that certain items found by Commerce to be general expenses and allowed in part as adjustments to Exporter’s Sales Price (ESP) should not be limited as provided in 19 C.F.R. § 353.15(c) (1983).

This matter was commenced by the filing of a summons on January 27, 1981, and a…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Alhambra Foundry Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  2. Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  3. Hercules, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
  4. Rhone Poulenc, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  5. Philipp Bros., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API