Legal Opinion
Conoco, Inc. v. United States Foreign-Trade Zones Board
United States Court of International Trade
Decided April 13, 1995No. Slip Op. 95-62. Court No. 90-06-00289PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CARMAN, Judge:
Plaintiffs move for judgment upon the agency record pursuant to U.S.CIT R. 56.1 to challenge certain conditions imposed by the United States Foreign-Trade Zones Board (FTZB or Board) upon the grants of foreign-trade subzones to plaintiffs Conoco, Inc. (Conoco) and Citgo Petroleum Corporation (Citgo). Defendants cross-move for judgment upon the agency record. This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(i)(l), (4) (1988) and, for the reasons which follow, enters judgment for defendants.
I. Background
This case is presently before the Court after remand to the FTZB. See…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kerr v. WGN Continental Broadcasting Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
- Miami Free Zone Corp. v. Foreign-Trade Zones BoardUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- Citgo Petroleum Corp. v. United States Foreign Trade-Zones BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Miami Free Zone Corp. v. Foreign-Trade Zones BoardUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- Citgo Petroleum Corporation v. The United States Foreign Trade-Zones BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996