Legal Opinion

Country Mutual Insurance v. Hartley

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 3, 2003No. 1 CA-CV 02-0428PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANKFORD, Judge.

¶ 1 This appeal requires us to determine whether Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 28-3160 (1998)1 (“section 28-3160”) abrogates the common-law family purpose doctrine. We hold that the statute does not limit parental liability under the doctrine. The family purpose doctrine imposes liability on the head of a family whose vehicle is used by a family member for family purposes. In contrast, the statute imputes a minor’s negligence or wilful misconduct when driving a vehicle to the person who signed the minor’s driving application. It also allows a parent or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Benton v. RegeserArizona Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Kilmer v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  4. Pesqueira v. TalbotCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  5. Jones v. ManhartCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Young v. BeckArizona Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API