Country Mutual Insurance v. Hartley
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANKFORD, Judge.
¶ 1 This appeal requires us to determine whether Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 28-3160 (1998)1 (“section 28-3160”) abrogates the common-law family purpose doctrine. We hold that the statute does not limit parental liability under the doctrine. The family purpose doctrine imposes liability on the head of a family whose vehicle is used by a family member for family purposes. In contrast, the statute imputes a minor’s negligence or wilful misconduct when driving a vehicle to the person who signed the minor’s driving application. It also allows a parent or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Benton v. RegeserArizona Supreme Court · 1919
- Kilmer v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- Pesqueira v. TalbotCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Jones v. ManhartCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Young v. BeckArizona Supreme Court · 2011