Legal Opinion

Ramos v. Pierce

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided May 4, 2023No. 2:22-cv-01956Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Thao Ramos, No. CV-22-01956-PHX-DJH 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Avery Brin Pierce, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Defendants Gina Pate Pierce and Stephen R. Pierce (collectively “Gina and 16 Stephen”) have specially appeared to file a Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 27).1 The Court must 17 determine whether it has personal jurisdiction over Gina and Stephen under Federal Rule 18 of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2). For the following reasons, the Court grants Gina and 19 Stephen’s Motion. 20 I. Background 21 This matter…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API