Legal Opinion

Farrow v. Ostrom

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1941No. 28490PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for injuries sustained when she was struck by an automobile driven by defendant Cameron W. Ostrom. From a judgment entered on the verdict of a jury in favor of plaintiff, defendants appeal.

The sole question to be determined is whether respondent was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. In approaching thé question, there are several fundamental rules to be observed. Contributory negligence is an affirmative defense, the burden of proving which is on the defendant; and only in rare instances is the court warranted in withdrawing…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McQuillan v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Silverstein v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Estill v. BerryWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Richmond v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Olsen v. Peerless LaundryWashington Supreme Court · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Godfrey v. WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Vannoy v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Bordynoski v. BergnerWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Ward v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Ashley v. EnsleyWashington Supreme Court · 1954

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API