Legal Opinion
Beavers-Gabriel v. Medtronic, Inc.
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided April 10, 2014No. Civ. No. 13-00686 JMS-RLPPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MEDTRONIC, INC. AND MED-TRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(B)(6)
J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On December 16, 2013, Plaintiff Karla Beavers-Gabriel (“Plaintiff’) filed this action against Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. (collectively, “Medtronic” or “Defendants”), asserting state law claims based on injuries she sustained after undergoing spinal surgery in which her surgeon used Defendants’ Infuse® Bone Graft (the “Infuse Device” or “Infuse®”), a Class III…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Walter Shuker v. Smith & Nephew PLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Aaron v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016
- Thorn v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, USA, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2015
- Martin v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2014
- Hafer v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2015
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.