Legal Opinion
Thorn v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, USA, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided January 23, 2015No. Case No. 1:13-cv-239PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JANET T. NEFF, District Judge.
Pending before the Court in this diversity-products liability action is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 50). Plaintiff filed a response in opposition to Defendants’ motion (Dkt. 52), and Defendants filed a reply (Dkt. 53). Defendants have also since filed numerous supplemental authori*621ties for the Court’s consideration (Dkts 54-57, 61-62). Having conducted a Pre-Motion Conference in this matter and having fully considered the parties’ written briefs and accompanying exhibits, the Court finds that the relevant facts and arguments are adequately presented…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Total Benefits Planning Agency, Inc. v. Anthem Blue Cross & Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Aaron v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016
- Clements v. Sanofi-Aventis, U.S., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- Warstler v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2017
- Angeles v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- A.W. v. Red Roof Inns, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.