Clemency v. Department of Revenue
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Siddoway, J.*
¶1 The estates of Barbara J. Nelson and Sharon M. Bracken (Estates) challenge the efforts of the Washington State Department of Revenue (DOR) to treat *554them as having engaged in a present taxable transfer of assets that were actually transferred years ago by Ms. Nelson’s and Ms. Bracken’s late husbands’ estates. As authority for finding and taxing fictional present transfers, DOR relies on the legislature’s adoption in 2005 of definitions from the federal estate tax regime. For federal estate tax purposes, the United States Department of the Treasury’s authority to presently tax…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Knowlton v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Milliken v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Coolidge v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hambleton v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Bravern Residential II, LLC v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Dot Foods, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- Comptroller of Treasury v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
- John Ley v. Clark County Public Transportation Benefit AreaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.