Legal Opinion

Milliken v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 2, 1931No. 87PublishedCited by 295 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

In this case certiorari was granted, 282 U. S. 817, to review a judgment of the Court of Claims denying to petitioners recovery of a tax alleged to have been illegally exacted under the decedents’ estates provisions of the Revenue Act of 1918. 38 F. (2d) 381; Act of February 24, 1919, c. 18, 40 Stat. 1057, 1096, 1097, 1149, 1150.

In December, 1916, while the Revenue Act of that year was in force (Act of Sept. 8, 1916, c. 463, 39 Stat. 756, 777), petitioners’ decedent gave to his children certain shares of corporate stock. The donor died March 5, 1920, after the effective date of the 1918 Act.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Corliss v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Brushaber v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Knowlton v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by295 opinions

  1. Welch v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Heiner v. DonnanSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Burnet v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. United States v. CarltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Helvering v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935

290 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API