Legal Opinion

Stramka v. Salt River Recreation, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 21, 1994No. 1 CA-CV 92-0100PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NOYES, Judge.

The issue is whether Arizona’s recreational use.statute, A.R.S. section 33-1551, immunizes Appellee Salt River Recreation, Inc. (“SRR”) from liability to Appellant Greze-gorz Stramka for personal injuries he received while floating the Salt River in an inner tube rented from SRR. We conclude that SRR does not qualify for the immunity granted by the recreational use statute because it is not an “occupant” of the premises in question. Because the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to SRR was based solely on recreational-use-statute immunity, we reverse and remand for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. SweetArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Walker v. City of ScottsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  4. Smith v. Sno Eagles Snowmobile Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  5. Bledsoe v. GoodfarbArizona Supreme Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  2. Smith v. Arizona Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  3. Ward v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Marcie Normandin v. Encanto AdventuresArizona Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Allen v. Prescott ValleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API