Marcie Normandin v. Encanto Adventures
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
JUSTICE LOPEZ, opinion of the Court:
¶1 We consider whether Arizona's recreational use statute, A.R.S. § 33-1551, immunizes Encanto Adventures LLC ("Encanto") from liability in a simple negligence action for injuries Marcie Normandin, a recreational user, sustained after falling in Encanto Park. We hold that Encanto is not a "manager" of land used for recreational purposes and therefore it is not immune from liability under the statute.
I
¶2 Encanto operates an amusement park in an area of Encanto Park known as Picnic Island. In 1991, the City of Phoenix (the "City") and Encanto's predecessor…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Third Nat. Bank in Nashville v. Impac Limited, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Diana Glazer v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2015
- Estate of braden/gabaldon v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2011
- Champie v. Castle Hot Springs Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- 3 Sl v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2024
- 3 Sl v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2024
- Haberl v. McAllisterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- Laveen Meadows v. MejiaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- REPUBLICAN NATL COMMITTEE v. FONTESArizona Supreme Court · 2026
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.