Legal Opinion

Marcie Normandin v. Encanto Adventures

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 2019No. CV-18-0200-PRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUSTICE LOPEZ, opinion of the Court:

¶1 We consider whether Arizona's recreational use statute, A.R.S. § 33-1551, immunizes Encanto Adventures LLC ("Encanto") from liability in a simple negligence action for injuries Marcie Normandin, a recreational user, sustained after falling in Encanto Park. We hold that Encanto is not a "manager" of land used for recreational purposes and therefore it is not immune from liability under the statute.

I

¶2 Encanto operates an amusement park in an area of Encanto Park known as Picnic Island. In 1991, the City of Phoenix (the "City") and Encanto's predecessor…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Third Nat. Bank in Nashville v. Impac Limited, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Diana Glazer v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Estate of braden/gabaldon v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Champie v. Castle Hot Springs Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. 3 Sl v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2024
  2. 3 Sl v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2024
  3. Haberl v. McAllisterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  4. Laveen Meadows v. MejiaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
  5. REPUBLICAN NATL COMMITTEE v. FONTESArizona Supreme Court · 2026

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API