Ward v. State
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOELLER, Vice Chief Justice.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
This is a personal injury action against the State of Arizona. The issue is whether the state can claim immunity under Arizona’s recreational use statute. See Ariz.Rev.Stat. Ann. (A.R.S.) § 33-1551 (1990) (amended 1993). The trial court held that the state could claim immunity and granted summary judgment for the state on that basis. The court of appeals affirmed in a published opinion. Ward v. State, 178 Ariz. 164, 871 P.2d 711 (App.1993). We granted plaintiffs’ petition for review and have jurisdiction under Ariz. Const, art. 6, §…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Walker v. City of ScottsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- Hazine v. Montgomery Elevator Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Bryant v. Continental Conveyor & Equipment Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1988
- Hall v. Turtle Lake Lions ClubCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Prince v. City of Apache JunctionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Estate of braden/gabaldon v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2011
- Kenison v. DuboisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Herman v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Dickey Ex Rel. Dickey v. City of FlagstaffArizona Supreme Court · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.