Legal Opinion

Ward v. State

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1995No. CV-93-0348-PRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOELLER, Vice Chief Justice.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

This is a personal injury action against the State of Arizona. The issue is whether the state can claim immunity under Arizona’s recreational use statute. See Ariz.Rev.Stat. Ann. (A.R.S.) § 33-1551 (1990) (amended 1993). The trial court held that the state could claim immunity and granted summary judgment for the state on that basis. The court of appeals affirmed in a published opinion. Ward v. State, 178 Ariz. 164, 871 P.2d 711 (App.1993). We granted plaintiffs’ petition for review and have jurisdiction under Ariz. Const, art. 6, §…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Walker v. City of ScottsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  3. Hazine v. Montgomery Elevator Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Bryant v. Continental Conveyor & Equipment Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Hall v. Turtle Lake Lions ClubCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Prince v. City of Apache JunctionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  2. Estate of braden/gabaldon v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Kenison v. DuboisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  4. Herman v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  5. Dickey Ex Rel. Dickey v. City of FlagstaffArizona Supreme Court · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API