Legal Opinion

Smith v. Arizona Board of Regents

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 8, 1999No. 1 CA-CV 98-0627PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GERBER, Judge.

¶ 1 We consider whether Arizona’s recreational use statute, Arizona Revised Statute Annotated (“A.R.S.”) section 33-1551, shields appellees from liability for injuries suffered by appellant while using a carnival-type apparatus temporarily placed on appellees’ property. We conclude that this statute does not provide tort immunity in such circumstances, and we therefore reverse the summary judgment entered in favor of appellees and remand for further proceedings.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 In the spring of 1997, appellant Todd R. Smith (“Smith”) was a student at…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Rivera v. Philadelphia Theological Seminary of St. Charles Borromeo, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Keelen v. State, Dept. of Culture, Recreation & TourismSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
  5. Boileau v. De CeccoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kimberly Ann Sallee, Individually and as Next Friend of Lucas Gregory Durkop and Maria Christina Rivera, Matthew James Sallee, and James Allan Sallee v. Matthew R. Stewart and Diana Stewart D/B/A Stewartland HolsteinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  2. Herman v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  3. Marcie Normandin v. Encanto AdventuresArizona Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Dykes v. Scotts Bluff County Agricultural Society, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Andresano v. County of PimaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API