Legal Opinion

Vause v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1965No. 10376PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

Review of a decision of the Industrial Commission denying Laurence Vause-Workmen’s Compensation for claimed disability resulting from lung, heart and circulatory deficiencies which he claims should be classified either as silicosis or other occupational disease which arose “directly as a natural incident of exposure occasioned by his employment” while working as a welder for the defendant,- Olsen Welding and Machine Shop. 1

On April 24, 1963, plaintiff filed for compensation with the State Insurance Fund; and on June 8, 1963, filed his application with the Industrial…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kavalinakis v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Kent v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Moray v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Hackford v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  5. State Ins. Fund v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Okland Construction Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Entwistle Co. v. WilkinsUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Redman Warehousing Corp. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Perchelli v. Utah State Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Garner v. Hecla Mining CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1967

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API