Garner v. Hecla Mining Company
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Chief Justice:
Plaintiffs, the widow and children of Douglas Garner, attack the findings and order of the Industrial Commission denying benefits for his death which they contend resulted from an occupational disease caused *369from working as a uranium miner for the defendant Hecla Mining Company.
Mr. Garner had worked in and around uranium mines since 1940, IS years of it underground. The last eight years had been in Utah, four years of that for the defendant Hecla Mining Company. He became ill and was hospitalized on July 14, 1963. Tests were taken which revealed extensive…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kavalinakis v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1926
- Kent v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1936
- Vause v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1965
- Edlund v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSIONUtah Supreme Court · 1952
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kaiser Steel Corp. v. MonfrediUtah Supreme Court · 1981
- Johnston v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1984
- Olson v. Federal American PartnersWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
- Mellen v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1967
- Wiseman v. Village PartnersUtah Supreme Court · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.