Legal Opinion

Kent v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1936No. 5755PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOFFAT, Justice.

This is an application for review of a decision of the Industrial Commission of Utah, denying compensation to Charles Kent for an alleged injury arising out of an accident while engaged in the course of his employment.

It is alleged by the applicant that he, on February 23, 1935, while employed as assistant florist by Salt Lake City Corporation suffered an injury by accident. He was engaged at the time of the alleged accident in tending the furnace and carrying clinkers up stairs from the furnace. That in climbing the stairs with two buckets filled with clinkers he stumbled and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kavalinakis v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Gagos v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Utah-Idaho Central R. Co. v. Ind. Comm. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Kaiser Steel Corp. v. MonfrediUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Carling v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Vause v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Baker v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Martinson v. W-M Insurance Agency, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1980

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API