Legal Opinion

Kavalinakis v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1926No. 4337PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

The plaintiff, hereinafter called applicant, a nonresident alien residing in Greece, through an attorney in fact, made application to the Industrial Commission hereinafter called commission, for compensation as a dependent of his son, familiarly known in this country as Gust Yalivas, who was killed March 8, 1924, in a mine explosion at Castle Gate, Utah, while employed in the coal mine of the Utah Fuel Company, one of the defendants, hereinafter called company.

There is no question respecting any jurisdictional facts. After a number of hearings before the commission, it ren dered a decision…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Saunders v. New England Collapsible Tube Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  2. Martilla v. Quincy Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Kaiser Steel Corp. v. MonfrediUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Kent v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Park Utah Consolidated Mines Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Vause v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Spencer v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1935

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API