Legal Opinion

Entwistle Co. v. Wilkins

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1981No. 16879PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice: *

Plaintiffs Entwistle Company and its insurer, Home Insurance Company, seek reversal of an order by the Industrial Commission which awarded temporary total disability compensation to the defendant Jerry Wilkins caused by an accidental injury suffered by him arising out of his driving a truck for plaintiff Entwistle.

Plaintiffs contend that after the defendant’s injury and his subsequent termination of employment with plaintiff Entwistle, he performed work “of the same general character” during the period of time for which he was awarded the above compensation and that the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. E. R. Moore Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Granado v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Vetter v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Vause v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  5. United Park City Mines Company v. PrescottUtah Supreme Court · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Kaiser Steel Corp. v. MonfrediUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  2. King v. Industrial Com'n of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
  3. Pacific Power and Light v. ParsonsWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Marshall v. INDUS. COM'N OF STATE OF UTAHUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Rekward v. Industrial Com'n of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API