Legal Opinion
Thomsen v. Culver City Motor Co., Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 18, 1935No. Civ. 8738; Civ. 8739; Civ. 8737PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHINN, J., pro tem.
Appeals are presented in each of three cases which were consolidated and tried upon the same evidence, separate judgments having been rendered. They arose out of a series of transactions briefly outlined as follows:
Culver City Motor Company, Inc., was a corporation, the stock of which, except for three qualifying shares, was owned by J. E. Kerrigan; Charles H. Kerrigan was vice-president, G. A. Lang, secretary and L. Walker was the remaining director and assistant secretary. The company was dealing in automobiles. In August, 1929, it made a transfer of all its assets to J.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Terry Trading Corp. v. BarskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Wienke v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Front Street, Mission & Ocean Railroad v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Steele v. MarsicanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Vujacich v. Southern Commercial Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Frances T. v. Village Green Owners Assn.California Supreme Court · 1986
- McClure v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Taylor v. S & M Lamp Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961
- Ulwelling v. Crown Coach Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Price v. HibbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.