Steele v. Marsicano
California Supreme Court
Appeal from, a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The defendant carries on the business of packing fruit at a warehouse on Battery street, in San Francisco, under the name of Overland Packing Company, and is also the president of the American Salt Company, and has his office, or headquarters, at the office of that corporation, on Sacramento street, in that city. On March 19, 1892, a man named Latón visited the office of the salt company, and inquired for the defendant, saying that he wished to store some sugar with him at his place on Sacramento street. The defendant was absent from San Francisco, and the clerk in charge told him that they…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nelson v. IversonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850
- Kelsey v. GriswoldNew York Supreme Court · 1849
- Gurley v. ArmsteadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Whitney v. SlausonNew York Supreme Court · 1859
- Burditt v. HuntSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1845
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Software Design & Application, Ltd. v. Hoefer & Arnett, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- Voris v. LampertCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- Daggett v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Varney v. CurtisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Thomsen v. Culver City Motor Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1935
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.