Burkle v. Burkle
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BOLAND, J.
SUMMARY
The issue in this case is the enforceability of a postmarital agreement. We affirm the trial court’s order finding the agreement valid and enforceable. Our conclusions are:
—A presumption of undue influence does not arise in an interspousal transaction unless one spouse obtains an unfair advantage or obtains property for which no or clearly inadequate consideration has been given. The presumption does not apply to a postmarital agreement in which both spouses obtain advantages; both are represented by independent and competent legal counsel; the wife is offered full…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- In Re Marriage of BondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Fukuda v. City of AngelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Mejia v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Vai v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Pannu v. Land Rover North America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Perez v. VAS S.p.A.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Navigators Specialty Insurance Co. v. Moorefield Construction, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Binette v. Binette (In re Binette), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Kushesh v. Kushesh-Kaviani (In re Kushesh), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.