Legal Opinion

Binette v. Binette (In re Binette)

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided June 29, 2018No. E068010PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRamirez, P.J.

*1122In this family law matter between William Binette (husband) and Diane Binette (wife), husband appeals from an order setting aside a default judgment that incorporated a marital settlement agreement (MSA). He contends the trial court erred by considering evidence not presented, submitted, or admitted at the hearing, in violation of Family Code 1 section 217. He further asserts that the court erroneously relied upon an incorrect legal standard when it found the failure to complete preliminary and final disclosures provided sufficient *357grounds to vacate the judgment. We affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Elkins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Rosevear v. RosevearCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Burkle v. BurkleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Benjamin S. v. Teddy S.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Brewer v. FedericiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. George v. Deamon (In re George), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. In re Marriage of George & DeamonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  3. Marriage of CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  4. O.L. v. State Dept. of Social Services CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API