Binette v. Binette (In re Binette)
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtRamirez, P.J.
*1122In this family law matter between William Binette (husband) and Diane Binette (wife), husband appeals from an order setting aside a default judgment that incorporated a marital settlement agreement (MSA). He contends the trial court erred by considering evidence not presented, submitted, or admitted at the hearing, in violation of Family Code 1 section 217. He further asserts that the court erroneously relied upon an incorrect legal standard when it found the failure to complete preliminary and final disclosures provided sufficient *357grounds to vacate the judgment. We affirm.
I. FACTUAL AND…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Elkins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Rosevear v. RosevearCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Burkle v. BurkleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Benjamin S. v. Teddy S.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Brewer v. FedericiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- George v. Deamon (In re George), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- In re Marriage of George & DeamonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- Marriage of CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- O.L. v. State Dept. of Social Services CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2020