Legal Opinion
State v. Donovan
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided March 22, 1988No. DC 53517 S; CA A40898; SC S34079PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
Defendant appealed his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII) to the Court of Appeals, contending that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the charge on the ground of collateral estoppel. The Court of Appeals affirmed defendant’s conviction. 85 Or App 237, 736 P2d 570 (1987). We affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.
Defendant argues that the issue of his intoxication was decided in his favor at a prior probation revocation hearing and that the state cannot relitigate that issue in this DUII conviction. Thus, the issue presented is the extent…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Sealfon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Russell v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Dean v. Exotic Veneers, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. ReuterOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Bahler v. FletcherOregon Supreme Court · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- B.B. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- State v. TrenaryOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. McDowellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.