Legal Opinion
Allstate Insurance v. Reynolds
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided October 23, 1997No. 95-P-1429PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The issue in this declaratory judgment action brought by Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate) is whether the personal injury claims of Amy Reynolds are barred by the three-year statute of limitations. See G. L. c. 260, § 2A. Reynolds moved for summary judgment; the Superior Court judge ruled that the statute of limitations was tolled by the provisions of G. L. c. 231, § 140B, and he allowed Reynolds’s motion. Allstate appealed.
The following facts are undisputed. On August 7, 1989, Reynolds was injured when an automobile in which she was a passenger was involved in an accident with a vehicle…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Hashimi v. KalilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Avery v. SteeleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Allen v. BatchelderMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
- Beatty v. NP CORP.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Ben v. SchultzMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
- DiMaio Family Pizza & Luncheonette, Inc. v. Charter Oak Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Dimaio Family Pizza & Luncheonette, Inc. v. Charter Oak Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- Campbell v. SchwartzMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
- Associated Chiropractic Service, Inc. v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.