Beatty v. NP CORP.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.
For six years, 2 during which it sent progress bills aggregating $132,173.59, 3 which the client paid, Sullivan & Worcester, a law firm, computed its bills on the basis of time charges and disbursements. The case on which the work billed was done involved a dispute with the Commonwealth over excise taxes. Ultimately, the law firm achieved a highly successful result for its client and billed a “premium” fee of an additional $721,888. The question is whether, on this record, the law firm was free to render a “premium” bill. A judge of the Superior Court, acting on a motion for summary judgment,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Attorney General v. BaileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Merrimack Valley National Bank v. BairdMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Carey v. New England Organ BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Goldstone & Sudalter, P.C.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- In re FordhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Malonis v. HarringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. National Consolidated Warehouses, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.