Legal Opinion

Avery v. Steele

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 3, 1993PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLiacos, C.J.

In this case, we consider whether an appellate court has the authority to impose sanctions on a party or on her attorney for inappropriate matter contained in her appel late brief. We limit our discussion of the facts to the proceedings following trial. We need state only that the underlying action, which arose in the Boston Housing Court, involved a dispute about the rent-control status of an apartment in the city of Boston. The apartment was occupied by Marilyn Avery and owned by Sandra Steele. Avery appealed from the dismissal of her complaint after trial and from the entry of a default…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Mission Denver Co. v. PiersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. Walter G. Finch v. Hughes Aircraft CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  4. Allen v. BatchelderMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
  5. Romala Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Symmons v. O'KeeffeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  2. Millennium Equity Holdings, LLC v. MahlowitzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  3. Oxford Global Res., LLC v. HernandezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  4. Ginsberg v. BlackerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
  5. Masterpiece Kitchen & Bath, Inc. v. GordonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API