Legal Opinion
Ben v. Schultz
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided September 24, 1999No. 98-P-132PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLenk, J.
Gordon Schultz appeals from decisions of a single justice of this court dismissing as untimely an appeal brought by Schultz pursuant to G. L. c. 231, § 6G, and denying Schultz’s subsequent motions for reconsideration and enlarge*809ment of time. Schultz contends in essence that the § 6G appeal was timely because the ten-day appeal period triggered by receipt of the trial court’s decision on a motion brought under G. L. c. 231, § 6F, was stayed by virtue of Mass.R.Civ.P. 59(e), 365 Mass. 827 (1974), during the pendency of a motion for reconsideration of the § 6F decision which Schultz brought in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Rollins Environmental Services, Inc. v. Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Avery v. SteeleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Friedman v. Board of Registration in MedicineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Vittands v. SudduthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
- Demoulas Super Markets, Inc. v. RyanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- Powell v. StevensMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- Danger Records, Inc. v. BergerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- DeLucia v. KfouryMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.