Legal Opinion
Lindquist v. Tambrands, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided September 21, 1989No. Civ. 4-88-443PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MacLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the motion of defendant Tambrands, Inc. for partial summary judgment. The motion will be granted.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Cynthia Jo Lindquist developed toxic shock syndrome (TSS) following her use of Tampax-brand tampons purchased from Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 1 Tampax-brand tampons are manufactured by Tamb-rands, Inc. (Tampax). Plaintiff and her husband have sued Tampax and Wal-Mart under Minnesota law on theories of strict liability, negligence, breach of express and implied warranties, misrepresentation and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kandis L. Papike v. Tambrands Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Lamontagne v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1993
- Bravman v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,061 National Bank of Commerce of El Dorado, as Administrator of the Estate of Margaret Armon Wilson, Deceased v. Kimberly-Clark CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Hunsaker v. Surgidev Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.