Legal Opinion
Heimbach v. Riedman Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 27, 2001No. 99-1295 (JRT/RLE)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
TUNHEIM, District Judge.
Plaintiff Robert Heimbach (“Heimbach”) brings claims against defendant Riedman Corporation (“Riedman”) for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, as well as claims for discrimination and retaliation pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Minnesota Human Rights Act. The claims arise in an employment context and result from Riedman’s termination of Heimbach as an insurance producer. This case is now before the Court on…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Anderson v. Coors Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Johnson v. MithunDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2005
- Ring v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
- Murphy v. M.C. Lint, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2006