Legal Opinion
Ring v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 4, 2003No. 01-CV-1964 (JMR/FLN)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROSENBAUM, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. This case arises out of plaintiffs employment with Sears, Roebuck and Co. (“Sears”).
Plaintiffs employment was terminated following a series of disputes she had with a coworker. Plaintiff brought this suit in Minnesota state court alleging wrongful retaliatory discharge, in violation of Minn. Stat. § 181.932. Defendant properly removed the case to this Court under its diversity jurisdiction, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1332.
I. Background
Ms. Ring was hired by Sears as a part-time vacuum cleaner…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Hartnagel v. NormanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- 3M Co. v. Intertape Polymer Group, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2006
- Mallon v. U.S. Physical Therapy, Ltd.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2005
- Johnson v. MithunDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2005