Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Mithun

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided November 29, 2005No. Civ. 04-2766JRTFLNPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

TUNHEIM, District Judge.

Plaintiff Jennifer Johnson brought this action against her former employer, defendant Campbell Mithun (“CM”), asserting claims under the Family Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), the Minnesota Human Rights Act (“MHRA”), and common law invasion of privacy. Defendant moves for summary judgment on plaintiffs claims. For the reasons discussed below, the Court grants in part and denies in part defendant’s motion.

BACKGROUND

Defendant Campbell Mithun is an advertising…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Donna Krenik v. County of Le SueurCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Halberg v. Location Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
  2. Olinger v. Renville CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
  3. Said v. Mayo ClinicDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API