Legal Opinion

Hill v. Workday, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 28, 2025No. 3:23-cv-06558Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 7 8 ANTHONY C. HILL, Case No. 23-cv-06558-PHK 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART AND DENY-IN-PART DEFENDANT 10 v. WORKDAY, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF ANTHONY C. 11 WORKDAY, INC., et al., HILL’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 12 Defendants. Re: Dkt. 58 13 14 Now before the Court is Defendant Workday, Inc.’s (“Workday”) Motion to Dismiss 15 Plaintiff Anthony C. Hill’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). [Dkt. 58]. After carefully 16 considering the Parties’ briefing, all relevant documents, and oral…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Wilhelm v. RotmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API