Legal Opinion
Lawson v. Grubhub, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 11, 2023No. 3:15-cv-05128Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RAEF LAWSON, individually and in his Case No. 15-cv-05128-JSC capacity as Private Attorney General 8 Representative, ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 9 Plaintiff, FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. 10 Re: Dkt. No. 335 11 GRUBHUB, INC., et al., Defendants. 12 13 Raef Lawson (Lawson), on a representative basis under California’s Private Attorneys 14 General Act, Cal. Lab. Code. § 2698 et seq., alleges Grubhub Holdings Inc. and Grubhub Inc. 15 (Grubhub) violated California law by failing to reimburse its drivers for necessary…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Edwards v. AguillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.