National Automoble Insurance Co. v. Cunningham
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of defendant after the trial judge had granted her motion for a nonsuit, and also an attempted appeal from such order.
The rules governing the granting of a motion for non-suit are clearly set forth in 9 California Jurisprudence, 551, as follows:
“A motion for nonsuit involves the legal effect of admitted facts. When made at the close of plaintiff’s case it in purpose and effect operates as a demurrer to the evidence, and must therefore assume that all the evidence in favor of the plaintiff, if relevant to the issues, is true. It is, therefore,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gornstein v. PriverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Morris v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Sayles v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Eastman v. RabbethCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Gomez v. LindbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
3Cited by10 opinions
- Baugh v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Wiebe v. SeelyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Estate of RabinowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Johns v. HakeWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Gosling v. NicholsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.