Legal Opinion

National Automoble Insurance Co. v. Cunningham

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 5, 1940No. Civ. 2466PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of defendant after the trial judge had granted her motion for a nonsuit, and also an attempted appeal from such order.

The rules governing the granting of a motion for non-suit are clearly set forth in 9 California Jurisprudence, 551, as follows:

“A motion for nonsuit involves the legal effect of admitted facts. When made at the close of plaintiff’s case it in purpose and effect operates as a demurrer to the evidence, and must therefore assume that all the evidence in favor of the plaintiff, if relevant to the issues, is true. It is, therefore,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gornstein v. PriverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  2. Morris v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Sayles v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Eastman v. RabbethCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Gomez v. LindbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Baugh v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Wiebe v. SeelyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Estate of RabinowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Johns v. HakeWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Gosling v. NicholsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API