Legal Opinion

Morris v. Standard Oil Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1926No. Docket No. L.A. 8612PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

—The main question to be determined on this appeal is whether or not a lien for the amount of the compensation paid an injured employee by the insurance carrier of the employer, and allowed under the provision of section 26 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act [Stats. 1917, p. 854], against a judgment for personal injuries recovered by the employee against the person causing the injuries, is assignable.

Milton Morris, a minor, the plaintiff, was run over by a truck operated by the defendant, Standard Oil Company, and seriously injured while in the course of his employment by the Chronicle…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morris v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Stapp v. Madera Canal & Irrigation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
  3. Dibble v. San Joaquin Light & Power Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Morris v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Goodley v. Wank & Wank, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Brown v. Guarantee InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. County of San Diego v. Sanfax Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Wikstrom v. Yolo Fliers ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Franklin v. FranklinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API