Legal Opinion

Smith v. Long

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 21, 2001No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiffs, John T. Smith and George L. Smith, Jr., entered into discussions with Robert D. Long and Tracey Long (defendants) to form a corporation that would be eligible for minority business enterprise (MBE) status and would compete in the same field as JTS Computer Services, Inc., a business owned by plaintiffs. On October 13, 1994, plaintiffs and defendants executed a formation agreement (Formation Agreement), naming the new corporation Long & Associates, Inc. (L & A)…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ciesinski v. Town of AuroraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Austin Instrument, Inc. v. Loral Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. 805 Third Ave. Co. v. M.W. Realty AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Ta Chun Wang v. Chun WongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. Muscarella v. MuscarellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. WhitehurstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Merhav Ampal Group, Ltd. v. Merhav (M.N.F.) Ltd. (In re Ampal-American Israel Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  3. Welch v. Di BlasiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Craig v. Bank of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  5. Festinger v. EdrichNew York Supreme Court · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API