Legal Opinion
Festinger v. Edrich
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 10, 2005PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Yvonne Lewis, J.
In this action by plaintiff Samuel Festinger seeking the imposition of a constructive trust and alleging claims of conversion and unjust enrichment, defendants George Edrich, Ellen Baratz, Bruce Edrich, Jonathan E. Edrich, and Dina Edrich (collectively, defendants) move for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs complaint as against them.
The background of this matter is as follows: during the time period of January 1, 1986 through December 31, 1995, plaintiff had engaged in a fraudulent scheme with respect to the sale of fuel to individuals and businesses,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Hidden Oaks Limited, Hidden Oaks Limited, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. The City of Austin, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Hall v. GE Plastic Pacific PTE Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Environmental Concern, Inc. v. Larchwood Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Colonial Funding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Janke v. JankeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Festinger v. EdrichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006