Legal Opinion

Welch v. Di Blasi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 21, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied the motion of James V. Welch (plaintiff) to strike defendants’ answer and counterclaims based on the doctrine of unclean hands. Contrary to defendants’ contention, plaintiff did not waive the right to assert that doctrine by failing to *965plead it as an affirmative defense (see, Richards v Levy, 40 AD2d 1055, 1055-1056). We agree with defendants, however, that the doctrine of unclean hands does not apply here. Under that doctrine, “one who has executed an agreement to perpetrate a fraud has ‘forfeited his right,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Weiss v. Mayflower Doughnut Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. Ta Chun Wang v. Chun WongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Agati v. AgatiNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Mehlman v. AvrechAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Agati v. AgatiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. HomeEnergy Inc. v. AEC Yield Capital LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022
  2. Marcucci v. Di BlasiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Toobian v. GolzadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API