Ciesinski v. Town of Aurora
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied the motions for summary judgment of defendants, County of Erie, Buffalo and Erie County Public Library and Town of Aurora and of third-party defendant Aurora Town Public Library (defendants) dismissing the complaint. Defendants have not pursued in their briefs the issue raised in their motion papers in Supreme Court that they were entitled to summary judgment because plaintiff failed to offer proof of negligent application of wax or negligent refinishing of the floors. We, therefore, deem that issue abandoned…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Eddy v. Tops Friendly MarketsNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Eddy v. Tops Friendly MarketsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Fresh Pond Road Associates v. Estate of SchachtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- First National Bank v. Mountain Food Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Lamphear v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,052 opinions
- Giglio v. NTIMP Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Parkhill v. ClearyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Carlson v. PorterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Vitale v. Rosina Food Products Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Turner v. CanaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
1,047 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.