Legal Opinion

United States v. Clallam County

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided June 28, 1922No. 294EPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The railroad in issue was constructed as an instrumentality of the govern*647ment as a war necessity, and was not engaged in commercial business, or the business of a common carrier, and all the activities of the said corporation since the signing of the Armistice have been with the view of winding up its business. The issue, concisely stated, is: Was the plaintiff corporation a mere instrumentality of the United States in carrying forward preparations to facilitate the prosecution of the war, or is it a corporate entity which stripped the interest of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minneapolis Civic & Commerce Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. United States v. BeebeSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. J. J. McCaskill Co v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Co. v. Arctic Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Clallam County v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Langer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  3. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. United States v. Skinner & Eddy CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1928
  5. United States v. Skinner & Eddy CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API