Legal Opinion

Langer v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 7, 1935No. 10204PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Circuit Judge.

The appellants were convicted under an indictment charging violation of the pro- . visions of section 37 of the Criminal Code (R. S. § 5440, 18 USCA § 88). The indictment charges appellants and four other defendants, Joseph A. Kinzer, Paul J. Yoeter, G. A. Hample, and Oscar Erickson, with conspiring to administer corruptly and to .cause the corrupt administration of certain acts of Congress for the promotion of their own political interests and for their own financial gain and profit, contrary to the true intent and policy of said acts, wasteful of the money so…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Myers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Smith v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. United States v. CrimminsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  2. State v. JenningsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  3. Henry Kenneth Wangrow v. United States of America (Two Cases). Daniel Edmund Czajkowski and Mark Edward Murphy v. United States of America (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  4. Galatas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  5. United States v. Frank DeanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API